This STILL isn't proper earthquake safety procedure!

Looking at the image and how it shakes for more than a few seconds actually hurts my eyes.

Was this supposed to be one of those 3D images that pulls the screen back and forth?

oh god, it's an earthquake! everybody run!

"animated"

Wait, .png files can be animated?

goddamn watching this is hella jarring. Does anybody else get a peircing headache when they watch this?

Idem said:
I just took post #1072948 split it in half and switched between the two frames. I can tell it's not being received that well probably because it is pretty jarring. But I have never been able to use the side by side images.

I bet if you add a few more frames and made it slower, it'd be a ton better

I only get a still image, static

Sengorn_Leopardae said:
I bet if you add a few more frames and made it slower, it'd be a ton better

I wasn't the one who made the frames. I don't have that much artistic talent.

FeraligatrOfDoom said:
I only get a still image, static

I'm guessing that your browser doesn't support APNG files

I can't see the animation. All I see is a stationary PNG.

Y'know... I can't remember what it was called, but I remember a website or program that would take both sides of a stereoscopic (or whatever it's called) image and animate it into a slowly rotating gif instead of this really janky effect.

Might want to look into that.

Knotty_Dragon said:
I can't see the animation. All I see is a stationary PNG.

It's animated png, get chrome/firefox: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Tech/APNG

Qwazzy said:
Y'know... I can't remember what it was called, but I remember a website or program that would take both sides of a stereoscopic (or whatever it's called) image and animate it into a slowly rotating gif instead of this really janky effect.

Might want to look into that.

http://depthy.me/
However that website and similar software relies on depthmatp, I know that the stereogram editor of these do these manually, so you would have to generate depthmap somehow before that's possible and that would result stuff like edge artifacting.

this looks likd a well done but fucked up 3d thing

This doesn't seem to be animated at all for me... is there something I'm supposed to click?

I thought my tablet was lagging lmao

this is a perfect image if you are trying to give yourself a seizure.

Regardless, it doesn't make a proper 3d effect.

their should be a not_really_animated tag

Shaking did not start for a good bit for me, Then it did.

NoodleSoup said:
their should be a not_really_animated tag

it's more of a quick looped slideshow if anything

DracosBlackwing said:
This doesn't seem to be animated at all for me... is there something I'm supposed to click?

did you click the link to view the original image?

I've never seen this many downvotes before, I see why.

I'm wondering about that, too. I mean, I don't like wigglegrams much myself, but this one's quite competently done. At least as far as I can tell by, you know, looking. I would have expected it to land somewhere below 10 votes, but not in the negatives, and definitely not this far into the negatives.

I love how the original has 99 upvotes and this "one" has 99 downvotes

I personally think that posts that have less than -100 on its score should be deleted.

Those are a LOT of dislikes for a Rajii post but I can understand because of epilepsy. Holy shit

ow my eyes

My eyes hurt.

But wait, how does it work? I downloaded it and it was a png but in a browser it's animated.

DracosBlackwing said:
This doesn't seem to be animated at all for me... is there something I'm supposed to click?

Have you set e621 to resize images ? Set it to not do that or click the "View Original" button above

Oh come on people, we're below -130 now. There's worse content to spend your hard-earned dislikes on.

Mr._Hagi said:
Oh come on people, we're below -130 now. There's worse content to spend your hard-earned dislikes on.

you underestimate the power of the downvoters

Mr._Hagi said:
Oh come on people, we're below -130 now. There's worse content to spend your hard-earned dislikes on.

True, I was afraid there'd be something that would haunt my nightmares for weeks to come, instead of a botched 3D effect

for what reason does this need to exist

I'm not even epileptic and I'm getting a headache

I clicked this thinking
Why is there an epilepsy warning? It's just a norm-
oh...

Cause you make my earfquake

I was wondering why this was so downvoted, then it loaded

I dunno about you guys, this is kinda cool...

Earthquakes? In MY Gloryhole?

This is extremly painful to look at.

Wait, why is this so downvoted? It looks fantast- oh... I see.

Interesting

Still don't know what the fuck they tried to do.

noteuropeansavior said:
Still don't know what the fuck they tried to do.

I can't easily cross my eyes and get the 3d effect like in the parent post, so I took both halves and made a video that switches between them really quickly.

idem said:
I can't easily cross my eyes and get the 3d effect like in the parent post, so I took both halves and made a video that switches between them really quickly.

Ah, ok, makes sense

At least you tried :)

furrets_email said:
At least you tried :)

I'm happy with the result. And being honest, it is fun to know I have uploaded the (currently) sixth most downvoted post.

Why so many dislikes?

honestly I can't see why this is one of the most dislikes, what's *bad* about it?

whys this severely downvoted? it looks like a still image

enderking said:
whys this severely downvoted? it looks like a still image

Your browser probably doesn't support APNG. It shakes like post #550615 which is why it's downvoted.

I laughed

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

bro this shit fucking made my day ROFL

me- y tf is this so diliked?
img - loads
me- ooooh that s y

this image fr just said ⬅️ ➡️ ⬅️ ➡️ ⬅️ ➡️

that's a lot of dimensions you got there

I-I nearly laughed water.

IM DYING OF LAUGH omfg bahahahhahahaha

"This is sempiternal!" :)

This is just... Jarring. Talk about an epilepsy hazard.

joe_is_here said:
"This is sempiternal!" :)

LMAOOOO i just remembered this post and came back about to post the link to the music video 😭😭

"quality standards"

nirn said:
Looking at the image and how it shakes for more than a few seconds actually hurts my eyes.

Was this supposed to be one of those 3D images that pulls the screen back and forth?

yeah, and the 3d effect works for me without making me throw up. idk whats wrong with ya :/

ah yes. animation. i can animation do the

Putting an earthquake effect on an image and calling it "animation" is lazy, but I wouldn't say that puts on a 1.2K dislikes level of awful.