The only correct response to such an offer is
“I’ll take six”

Always best straight from the tap.

If the udders weren't there this would be a lot better.

Ma'am. I represent the United States' Food and Drug Administration. I'd like to ask you a few questions...

Spyro_frost said:
If the udders weren't there this would be a lot better.

Usually Im none for udders either, but this is an exception.

Spyro_frost said:
If the udders weren't there this would be a lot better.

Dunno why you got that few dislikes, but I made version without udders tho. So have a look. ;)

Nah a genetically engineered cowgirl should have udders. No half measures over here.

Spyro_frost said:
If the udders weren't there this would be a lot better.

Yeah, I never understood it. Udders and boobs are basically the same thing and serve literally the same function, why have both?

LaviWasTaken said:
Dunno why you got that few dislikes, but I made version without udders tho. So have a look. ;)

You're a saint

Lance_Armstrong said:
Nah a genetically engineered cowgirl should have udders. No half measures over here.

I have to stop you right there. If we were able to modify living organisms on that scale and had full cow or other animal DNA sequence we would be able to make that organism either with or without boobs/udders as we please. So please cease to dictate what that cow girl should or shouldn't have based on your preferences, alright? You have your share with udders, we have our without. I call it "Both sides pleased" situation.

LaviWasTaken said:
I have to stop you right there. If we were able to modify living organisms on that scale and had full cow or other animal DNA sequence we would be able to make that organism either with or without boobs/udders as we please. So please cease to dictate what that cow girl should or shouldn't have based on your preferences, alright? You have your share with udders, we have our without. I call it "Both sides pleased" situation.

That's true but you took my comment way too seriously this time.