OK, now who is Serah using to demonstrate to Sebastien the proper way to finger fuck? Her friend Morissa perhaps?

Foreshadowing possibly 🤔

Has to be Marissa the sheep girl.

Honestly hope its the mouse girl that has a crush on him

unfortunategod said:
Honestly hope its the mouse girl that has a crush on him

Yesssss, it would be amazing If it was introduced into the canon. Rachelle would be a nice addition to the main plot this way.

hell's_pixie said:
OK, now who is Serah using to demonstrate to Sebastien the proper way to finger fuck?

Joe

The headless one looks to be larger than either of them, notta sheep.
Could be the horse?

xelestdwe said:
hope it's uncanonical because it would be just indecent and immoral just using someone third to show how to do it. Isn't sex a sacred act of bonding and connection between two truly loving each other people in strong relationships and not just hookups with anyone you want?

It aint 1950 anymore big guy...you are on a furry porn site after all

xelestdwe said:
so... furries can't be decent like just normal people? I realize it is just a porn site in which everything is just for porn with fantasies and any fetishes but seems like people here actually adjust immoral depraved lifestyles full of sex, hookups, uncontrollable intercourses with strangers, orgies, drugs and any other degeneracy. and don't repeat that "muh people can do whatever they want" okay idk but does it mean they act normal and are not depraved and bad? And what "1950" supposed to mean? Or is all this thing not because of furries but because of "western civilization" and its society and perverted norms? And please tell me where I am wrong in my defenition of sex? Isn't that what everyone wants? A happy normal family and relationships rather than some debauchery? Of course I am a damn perv myself but at least I have decency within my fantasies irl. it's literally deviancy. it's called psychopathia. What about such beautiful things such as love, beauty, cuteness?

Calm down, there is no such thing as normal and certainly you are not being normal. People have the right to live how they like, like it or not. That could mean going around the world and hooking up with any stranger who will take them to bed, or that could mean finding the woman of their dreams settling down and having a family. All are valid ways to experience the world. The sex lives of our ancestors was much more varied then your single minded thoughts on what is moral and what is not. You honestly sound insecure about what you want, if you like sex being a sacred bond of love then find security that is what you want and don't judge others for their own chooses so long as they are doing so with honesty and the consent of others.

Now that we've covered advanced fingering techniques watch carefully as we move on to oral.

xelestdwe said:
There literally is. I am not normal but at least not so immoral. So would you consider rape or murder as something normal if there is no such thing? Or wouldn't you care? Oh right right this idiotic corny argument "muh people can do whatever they want" of course you can but could you preserve some decency and not doing bad immoral things? we live in a society with norms and morality you know. with something that is indisputably bad and good. oh and the second most idiotic argument... about that our ancestor's sex lives were more varied and they were more perverts. well no, it is simply a lie and it weren't. now the world is way way more depraved and a lot of things are allowed especially on the west. I actually insecure, I don't judge anyone, I am just saying how it is. Sex is a way of bonding between two lovers, it's a widespreaded opinion that is considered as norm and fucking with whomever you want is bad. I don't want to judge anyone, I also have just fucking disgusting fantasies but I would never try them. I don't judge, I just actually feel bad about what is happening in the world and how normalized it is.
I know that you are from a capitalist western world from this capitalist regime in which every carnal pleasure is allowed for money, in which there is a tsardom of culture of consumption and materialism so I don't judge people, or anyone. And the argument about "consent" is also idiotic. Sorry for creepiness but imagine if 12 year old child (in a country in which the age of consent is 12 like in Mexico) would agree and happy about being ruined by a gang of 2 meter guys with 30 cms dicks. Would you consider this as something insanely fucked up and horrible or normal just because there were consent?
And btw I like these two in the comics and by a plot they are siblings and are in incest relationships, idc because these are fantasies and it is actually a really cute comic (and that's why I am complaining tho, because it looks kinda explicit and too horny by now because I always thought about them as some really loving and caring about each others bonded couple) and will you also justify incest irl because of "consent"?
And btw here you are boing me for my opinion and you think it is good when you say something about the "judgment"? I don't hate anyone for it, I do judge it but not like some monster, I would be okay if I met someone like that in reality, I just have "normal" (it's not an insult, there is literally something normal in the world and something is abnormal) moral principles. Just because of feeling of uncertainty you imagine like a total bastard or what? No I am just the same human being as you, I wouldn't act like a dick about it at all. And if some consider everything I wrote is being a dick then I feel sorry.

The world isn't black and white and what you think is the norm and morally superior is just as problematic, as saying a modern 12 year old child is mature enough to make the judgement of consent to any adult chooses much less sex. Why the weirdly specific imagine if? I'm confused by your question on rape and murder, but considering both actions are by definition without consent they are immoral because as a basic human right we are allowed to choose with out other humans forcing there actions apon us, while there is a little grey area even here the most severe violations of this human right are considered by more humans to be not acceptable. Our ancestors sex lives were very varied, your assumptions are all based upon the culture you grew up in, not science which has proven this through evidence not assumptions. Incest isn't strictly immoral the context matters a lot, while parent child relationship should be avoided due to the evidence of greatly increased risk to have genetic disorders for their offspring, as well simply the power dynamics involved would likely make the relationship very unhealthy. Good news is incest is unfavorable in basic human behavior we are more likely to select partners with different enough traits, its just not healthy for us as species to reinforce genetic disorders, thous humans behavior prefers more genetic diversity.

Unfortunately we all live in capitalist hell hole, but what does the obsession with monetary gain have to do with your strict views on morality ? and my more accepting attitude towards sexual behavior. I am for more diverse life chooses not less, and I think the typical two person couple, a swinger, polyamory, all perfectly normal. There is nothing indisputable when it comes to ethics, context matters a lot, and no action is purely evil or good. We live in a world of gray, while I genuine believe certain actions are wrong it is with in the context in which I am thinking, rather then believing that there is no context in which some action may be right rather then wrong.

xelestdwe said:
hope it's uncanonical because it would be just indecent and immoral just using someone third to show how to do it. Isn't sex a sacred act of bonding and connection between two truly loving each other people in strong relationships and not just hookups with anyone you want?
why do people boing someone who is right? Do you all have normal attitide toward debauchery and depraved lifestyle, orgies, immoral random intercourses with strangers, drugs etc, instead of such beautiful things as family, love, wholesomeness? Please call me a puritan if you won't because I see nothing bad about this word, it's a compliment for me because seems like it means to have at least some sense and modesty

Ironically, there is nothing “decent” about your thought process. The mere thought of one penis and two vaginas in one place has you utterly melting down. It doesn’t matter, your feelings on it matter even less, and they shouldn’t even matter to you. Just move on.

graphix said:
Joe

J-j... Joe who...?

loper621 said:
J-j... Joe who...?

Joe

cryptkeeper0 said:
The world isn't black and white and what you think is the norm and morally superior is just as problematic, as saying a modern 12 year old child is mature enough to make the judgement of consent to any adult chooses much less sex. Why the weirdly specific imagine if? I'm confused by your question on rape and murder, but considering both actions are by definition without consent they are immoral because as a basic human right we are allowed to choose with out other humans forcing there actions apon us, while there is a little grey area even here the most severe violations of this human right are considered by more humans to be not acceptable. Our ancestors sex lives were very varied, your assumptions are all based upon the culture you grew up in, not science which has proven this through evidence not assumptions. Incest isn't strictly immoral the context matters a lot, while parent child relationship should be avoided due to the evidence of greatly increased risk to have genetic disorders for their offspring, as well simply the power dynamics involved would likely make the relationship very unhealthy. Good news is incest is unfavorable in basic human behavior we are more likely to select partners with different enough traits, its just not healthy for us as species to reinforce genetic disorders, thous humans behavior prefers more genetic diversity.

Unfortunately we all live in capitalist hell hole, but what does the obsession with monetary gain have to do with your strict views on morality ? and my more accepting attitude towards sexual behavior. I am for more diverse life chooses not less, and I think the typical two person couple, a swinger, polyamory, all perfectly normal. There is nothing indisputable when it comes to ethics, context matters a lot, and no action is purely evil or good. We live in a world of gray, while I genuine believe certain actions are wrong it is with in the context in which I am thinking, rather then believing that there is no context in which some action may be right rather then wrong.

Did that weirdo start messaging you privately as well, or just me? -_-

xelestdwe said:
bruh I just don't want to spam in the comments and talk in discord or something.
And "weirdo"? Seriously? Why? I don't justify indeceny or immoral lifestyle? And I sincerely cannot understand you all and I want to. I feel like I am the only one furry like I am.

No one is making you do anything. You didn’t have to type a single embarrassing word today. Move on.

Big old walls of text in these comments and meanwhile I cum on floor :D

xelestdwe said:
yeah and seems like I am a bad one here while you are acting so rude. Didn't your parents teach you how to communicate with people? you behave childish

It’s a cute pic. The sibling lovers are at it again, with Serah giving Seb a crash course on how better to please her. Who is this second girl? How’d this come about? Maybe we’ll find out later.

You sling around words like “normal, immoral, depraved,” but you fail to explain why that matters. Many consider incest to be immoral and depraved, but you’ve already said you know this is fiction, so it gets a pass. What is it about this image that has set you off so badly? You know there’s nothing you’ve raved about that the character in your profile, Genwyn, hasn’t been up to. Maybe seeing a girl finger another girl has you feeling insecure.

At any rate, the pic is fine, please move on.

Would love to see one of Seb teaching Serah how to properly massage a dick.

badwolf1 said:
The headless one looks to be larger than either of them, notta sheep.
Could be the horse?

I thought it was a zebra.

https://e621.net/posts/3151056?q=black-kitten

They're related to horses, but not the same species.

xelestdwe said:
hope it's uncanonical because it would be just indecent and immoral just using someone third to show how to do it. Isn't sex a sacred act of bonding and connection between two truly loving each other people in strong relationships and not just hookups with anyone you want?
why do people boing someone who is right? Do you all have normal attitide toward debauchery and depraved lifestyle, orgies, immoral random intercourses with strangers, drugs etc, instead of such beautiful things as family, love, wholesomeness? Please call me a puritan if you won't because I see nothing bad about this word, it's a compliment for me because seems like it means to have at least some sense and modesty

Shut up nerd

furryloves said:
It aint 1950 anymore big guy...you are on a furry porn site after all

That's the sad part :)
jk

Do you guys seriously not see that seal on the screen? The one that says “the official seal of non-canon art”?

xelestdwe said:
Your parents didn't teach how to communicate politely with people and still I am bad for my opinion and decency. Okay then. And stop provoking.

You argued morality and stuff about two vaginas while also having Judy hops face covered in cum from two dicks in your favorites. Thats not hypocritical at all.

lovestruck_warrior said:
That's the sad part :)
jk

I am all for what the dude is preaching. Even me personally, I prefer my sex to be romantic, passionate, and have it mean something. I can fuck myself just fine, been doing it since I was 14. I dont need fuck buddies. However where this guy is and where he is going isna rabbit hole I and I advise everyone else steer WELL clear from. We live in a day and age where humans understand humans better than ever. Our societies have been advancing faster than ever in any point in history. With such rapid advancment, society changes too and unlike what it was in whatever history this dude thinks about when he thinks of sex, people can just have sex. Its not a big deal at all. Partaking in sexual activities, no matter what they are, just for the pleasure you get from it, is perfectly healthy and nutural. Its not sinfull in the slightest.

What is wrong is how arrogant and stuck in his ways this guy is. Closing your mind, not letting anyome inside to try and add criticisim or validation to your own thoughts is a one way path down a bad road. I hope one day our friend here can see that and maybe learn to think things outside of the box.

I know you didnt ask for me to reply this much to you, but I am more trying to speak to the other guy and there is not a real good way to do that. The fact I even got to explain something like this to another human being, much less a fellow furry is sickening to be honest. The furry fandom is a very open one and it makes me upset to see a furry so hostile to new ideas.

furryloves said:
I am all for what the dude is preaching. Even me personally, I prefer my sex to be romantic, passionate, and have it mean something. I can fuck myself just fine, been doing it since I was 14. I dont need fuck buddies. However where this guy is and where he is going isna rabbit hole I and I advise everyone else steer WELL clear from. We live in a day and age where humans understand humans better than ever. Our societies have been advancing faster than ever in any point in history. With such rapid advancment, society changes too and unlike what it was in whatever history this dude thinks about when he thinks of sex, people can just have sex. Its not a big deal at all. Partaking in sexual activities, no matter what they are, just for the pleasure you get from it, is perfectly healthy and nutural. Its not sinfull in the slightest.

What is wrong is how arrogant and stuck in his ways this guy is. Closing your mind, not letting anyome inside to try and add criticisim or validation to your own thoughts is a one way path down a bad road. I hope one day our friend here can see that and maybe learn to think things outside of the box.

I know you didnt ask for me to reply this much to you, but I am more trying to speak to the other guy and there is not a real good way to do that. The fact I even got to explain something like this to another human being, much less a fellow furry is sickening to be honest. The furry fandom is a very open one and it makes me upset to see a furry so hostile to new ideas.

I'm not part of any fandom.
Anyway that was a load of your opinion, "healthy and natural" well too bad there's nothing natural about humanity.

Oh my fucking god this is the dumbest fandom on all the internet. He even went so far as to put a "this is not fucking cannon" sticker on it and you shitheads didn't read it.

graphix said:
Joe

Excellent kill.

not going to lie, I'm actually getting more entertainment reading the comments then form the pic itself lol.
amazing art as usual though, been following it for a wile and got way more attached to the characters and their relationships and the drama/world around them than I ever thought I would!

darkathearts said:
Has to be Marissa the sheep girl.

Let's go all the way down the rebbit hole and hope it's their mom

dinowarrior220 said:
Foreshadowing possibly 🤔

Missed the "Official Seal of Non-canon Art," huh?

xelestdwe said:
Please call me a puritan if you won't because I see nothing bad about this word, it's a compliment for me because seems like it means to have at least some sense and modesty

Hmm, nah. I don't see you as a puritan.
You're more of... A evangelical. I define an evangelical as any Christian forcing their beliefs on others and trying to force conformity wherever possible. And as to respond to the rest of your comment? Let's just say rome would've had a field day with you and you'd either of been exiled cause they just couldn't stand you or the 2nd option.

Let's learn to love our neighbours like the Christians did in Rome!

The fact that a huge argument spawned over the immorality of two twin siblings that are constantly fucking each other possibly including a third consensual person as a teaching aid is just such an internet thing.

tibbyt said:
You argued morality and stuff about two vaginas while also having Judy hops face covered in cum from two dicks in your favorites. Thats not hypocritical at all.

They hid their favorites 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 enjoy your permanent xelestdwe, you Nazi sympathizing asshole.

cryptkeeper0 said:
The world isn't black and white and what you think is the norm and morally superior is just as problematic, as saying a modern 12 year old child is mature enough to make the judgement of consent to any adult chooses much less sex. Why the weirdly specific imagine if? I'm confused by your question on rape and murder, but considering both actions are by definition without consent they are immoral because as a basic human right we are allowed to choose with out other humans forcing there actions apon us, while there is a little grey area even here the most severe violations of this human right are considered by more humans to be not acceptable. Our ancestors sex lives were very varied, your assumptions are all based upon the culture you grew up in, not science which has proven this through evidence not assumptions. Incest isn't strictly immoral the context matters a lot, while parent child relationship should be avoided due to the evidence of greatly increased risk to have genetic disorders for their offspring, as well simply the power dynamics involved would likely make the relationship very unhealthy. Good news is incest is unfavorable in basic human behavior we are more likely to select partners with different enough traits, its just not healthy for us as species to reinforce genetic disorders, thous humans behavior prefers more genetic diversity.

Unfortunately we all live in capitalist hell hole, but what does the obsession with monetary gain have to do with your strict views on morality ? and my more accepting attitude towards sexual behavior. I am for more diverse life chooses not less, and I think the typical two person couple, a swinger, polyamory, all perfectly normal. There is nothing indisputable when it comes to ethics, context matters a lot, and no action is purely evil or good. We live in a world of gray, while I genuine believe certain actions are wrong it is with in the context in which I am thinking, rather then believing that there is no context in which some action may be right rather then wrong.

I didn’t even read much, but these essay length scriptures are really out of pocket. These people are reciting the old magic of moral dilemmas in such texts, it is confusing why they care so much on this furry kink pornography site. Such as the topics of monogamy and rights and wrongs, it shouldn’t matter what people do in bed or how many times or where they do, or whom they do it with. In the end this I a site in which people get off to “animals” so talking on the rights of morals the topic should not be that of sexual habits and the how valid promiscuity and rape is depending on the person moral construct. We should instead direct our attention to the fact that at least in this case we are looking at a drawing of modified animals copulating and otherwise participating in intercourse/intercourse related things. So if we want to talk about morals and what is right and wrong, stick to the subject of we are all degenerates who like watching humanoid anthropomorphic creatures fuck each other and their families.

mr-man said:
Do you guys seriously not see that seal on the screen? The one that says “the official seal of non-canon art”?

I like how the presence of the seal implies pretty much everything else he’s ever drawn with these two is canon