I think the rating: q, is fair, nudity isn't truly explicit until it has something such as, oh, I don't know, say: intercourse, way too elongated members, way too elongated vag's, way too elongated of both, extreme fetishism such as being milked by a machine, overly large chest and nipples of a male / female clearly being presented, or fetish "needs" such as bodily fluids other than blood and gore or vomit. since the size of this characters chest is just a regular, flat size, and it doesn't show any of whats listed above: I say its passable as questionable, which should basically be "mature, but not pornographic" much like DA's formula.... any one got any objections? if so, take a stand and reply.

Furryletsplays said:
I think the rating: q, is fair, nudity isn't truly explicit until it has something such as, oh, I don't know, say: intercourse, way too elongated members, way too elongated vag's, way too elongated of both, extreme fetishism such as being milked by a machine, overly large chest and nipples of a male / female clearly being presented, or fetish "needs" such as bodily fluids other than blood and gore or vomit. since the size of this characters chest is just a regular, flat size, and it doesn't show any of whats listed above: I say its passable as questionable, which should basically be "mature, but not pornographic" much like DA's formula.... any one got any objections? if so, take a stand and reply.

You're over-thinking this; there are no genitals in the picture, but there are boobs. That makes it questionable. That's the rules, you don't have to spend 20+ minutes typing out a long reason.

Cool to see a defurred Amily.

kenten said:
Cool to see a defurred Amily.

actually she has fur it's just very fine. You can tell by the fur marks on her chest.