helsy created by helsy
Viewing sample resized to 72% of original (view original) Loading...
  • Comments
  • ADALEXAD said:
    I'd be concerned for the lack of clothing if he wasn't so HOT! Very sexy.

    I see a lot of clothing, what are you talking about

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • FAGGOTMACHINE said:
    why do i see tits if it's marked as male?

    It's the way the artist draws males (see also post #418087) Go ahead and change the tags if you want, but it's definitely male.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • I must apologize, but them's not pecks, at all.. those are breasts, which means either high estrogen or beginning trans-gender.. either way, adding moobs tag

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • 9002TailedKitsune said:
    adding moobs tag

    'Moobs' is one of the most disgusting and ugly words to have ever come into existence. Truly one of humanity's most despicable creations. And now you come along and sully this gorgeous piece of art with that awful slander.
    You must really fucking hate adorable little wolf boys. Thanks a lot, GUY. >:(

  • Reply
  • |
  • -3
  • Sai-Sai said:
    'Moobs' is one of the most disgusting and ugly words to have ever come into existence. Truly one of humanity's most despicable creations. And now you come along and sully this gorgeous piece of art with that awful slander.
    You must really fucking hate adorable little wolf boys. Thanks a lot, GUY. >:(

    What about it is inherently negative? It's just a descriptive word mashup, like transgender. He's male and has enough fatty tissue around his pectoral muscles to resemble small mammaries. Mammaries are boobs. Male + boob = moob.
    Some of you people are so sensitive about the most innocuous things and, frankly, it's a little hypocritical to advocate for gender fluidity while simultaneously shaming it.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • The_Masked_Newfag said:
    > Sees "breasts", "male", and "solo" tags all on the same picture

    WAT

    If a character with a vagina but masculine pectorals can still be considered female, I see no problem with this.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • PretentiousPeer said:
    If a character with a vagina but masculine pectorals can still be considered female, I see no problem with this.

    Yyyeah, nobody's disputing that. I was just expressing that my brain short-circuited at the sight of those seemingly conflicting tags. Now you've gone and made me have to explain the joke, so there IS no joke anymore. Do you feel proud of yourself? DO YOU?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • The_Masked_Newfag said:
    Yyyeah, nobody's disputing that. I was just expressing that my brain short-circuited at the sight of those seemingly conflicting tags. Now you've gone and made me have to explain the joke, so there IS no joke anymore. Do you feel proud of yourself? DO YOU?

    ;_;

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • The_Masked_Newfag said:
    *sigh* -_-

    *brohugs you*

    I'm not mad. I'm just mildly annoyed.

    With what you said earlier, I'm annoyed you said SOLO was a conflicting tag. There's only one entity in this image, so that means this entity is SOLOOOO. I do agree that having tits on a skinny man is conflicting, though.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Sai-Sai said:
    'Moobs' is one of the most disgusting and ugly words to have ever come into existence. Truly one of humanity's most despicable creations. And now you come along and sully this gorgeous piece of art with that awful slander.
    You must really fucking hate adorable little wolf boys. Thanks a lot, GUY. >:(

    wow, no need to get so salty... I kind of agree that the word 'moobs' is... less than optimal though. Maybe 'boi breasts'?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • stella-bullet said:
    With what you said earlier, I'm annoyed you said SOLO was a conflicting tag. There's only one entity in this image, so that means this entity is SOLOOOO. I do agree that having tits on a skinny man is conflicting, though.

    A little late, but I think the point of solo being listed was because those breasts are not on males, yet nobody else is seen.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0