April 10th: The bill has been vetoed!
April 2nd: The politicians in Arizona are about to sign into law a bill that would mandate sites like e621 to either impose age verification on all users or be at a risk of lawsuits. Such system would be required to go through third party vendors, who in turn must go through a government database to verify every user's age. This is not only a major violation of privacy, but it also opens up a very real danger of identity theft through phishing schemes and other methods, not to mention that we would not be able to control any of that information to make sure it is permanently deleted after age verification is complete.
Unfortunately, Arizona is the state out of which e621 operates, which means that this law will almost certainly affect us if it is to pass. If want to help us ensure that this site can continue to serve you without being required to know who you are, please ask the Arizona governor to veto this bill.
Please, help us get the word out by letting others know about this issue.
For some further information on what the bill does have a look at https://action.freespeechcoalition.com/bill/arizona-hb-2586/
We still have a Discord server, come talk to us!
Want to advertise on e621? Click here!
DirtyRatMatt
MemberThought this was a doxy pic for a sec.
DorianBisamon
Memberwe have similar styles, soft and gentle. Like marshmallows!
RT Pilon
BlockedI hope you mean the food, and not the character...?
But yeah, very Doxy knockoff.
kalider
MemberJust similar styles?
Looks more like a face copy+merger from post #1829016 and post #2274653 to me (not a trace or direct copy but almost uncanny similarities).
post #1829016 post #2274653
-----------
Just flipped #1829016 horizontally, cropped out the head and put it in a ~60% opaque layer on top of this image. It fits unbelievably good after a bit of turning and zooming (but not perfectly).
Updated
moximoore
MemberI think it's more an homage really.
...At least, I hope it is. O_o
DorianBisamon
Memberso you're saying that I didn't draw it myself, but that I drew the work of another artist? and that Judy belongs to this artist and I can't draw her the way I like? That would be considered stealing, right?
kalider
MemberI have no idea how you actually drew this image but I think it's more then just a distant possibility that you traced Doxy's work, modified it a bit and drew the rest yourself.
But even assuming that, it obviously wouldn't count as a trace under house rules.
What I take away from this is a more precise understanding of those rules.
DorianBisamon
Memberpeople like you who don't know how to appreciate the work of artists, there is no point in convincing them that they are wrong. If you do not like something, just do not look at it and do not spoil the mood of others with unfounded accusations.
Login to respond »