Giant penis cannons... Getting a little close to the actual point of war there...

H3xx said:
Giant penis cannons... Getting a little close to the actual point of war there...

aww u beat me to it with them pp guns

WolfhoundDeMerc said:
aww u beat me to it with them pp guns

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5qqARrbi1h8

Giant boob nipple gun
Vs
Giant penis cannon

Fenrick said:
hahaha no

I can't believe people would even type things like this, that's literally never happened

??? That happens all the time... You must be new to the Internet...

Fenrick said:
Wars simply are not about "dick-measuring contests" or whatever you were implying
While throwing one's weight around has been a motivating factor in war it is by no means "the actual point of (all) war," nor even the primary purpose of the ones that it's occurred with

I'll let George Carlin take this argument, because he said it better than I can.

George Carlin said:

I look at war a little bit differently. To me, war is a lot of prick-waving okay? Simple thing, that’s all it is, war is a whole lot of men standing out in a field waving their pricks at one another. Men are insecure about the size of their dicks and so they have to kill one another over the idea. That’s what all that asshole, jock bullshit is all about. That’s what all that adolescent, macho-male posturing, and strutting in bars and locker rooms is all about, it’s called “dick fear!” Men are terrified that their pricks are inadequate and so they have to compete with one another to feel better about themselves and since war is the ultimate competition, basically, men are killing each other in order to improve their self-esteem. You don’t have to be a historian or a political scientist to see the Bigger Dick foreign policy theory at work. It sounds like this: “What?! They have bigger dicks?! BOMB THEM!” And of course, the bombs and the rockets and the bullets are all shaped like dicks. It’s a subconscious need to project the penis into other people’s affairs. It’s called: “FUCKING WITH PEOPLE!”

Fenrick said:
Wars are almost always done for resources or (at least the illusion of) security. The latter can be mistaken for dick-waving or whatever, but usually (not always, but usually) there is some genuine reason for it.

Taking someone's shit is also dick waving. It's a complete inability to sit down and negotiate a reasonable trade deal with all parties involved. It's, "I don't have to negotiate with you! I have a bigger DICK! And I'm gonna hit you over the head with it and then take all your stuff."

Rationalize it all you want, but it comes down to mammalian dominance games which originated in "whoever has the biggest dick gets all the females. Whoever has the biggest muscles to compensate for their dick, can take the females from the guy with the biggest dick by force." Thus War was born.

Fenrick said:
No.

That's trivializing so much of the mindset that leads to these things in an overly simplistic way.

When it all boils down to it, that's all there is. The details and the names change, but it all has the Bigger Dick Foreign Policy theory at its heart.