kalider said:
sooo....
I've removed gynomorph, intersex & flat-chested and added male instead because this Judy does not look female.
But excluding the dick they don't look very male either...
Not so sure now what the correct set off tags is here.

Am I missing sth. in the howto or is this an edge case?

Are we ignoring the wide hips wider than the shoulders, a female trait? Or that the artist calls her a futanari, which is here in the description?

lostine621 said:
Are we ignoring the wide hips wider than the shoulders, a female trait? Or that the artist calls her a futanari, which is here in the description?

I don't know what you and others do but you are correct that I actually didn't took them into account.
What the artist calls the gender is irrelevant under TWYS.

Simplified Gender-tagging Flowchart says:

Penis or pussy?
    Penis -> male, gynomorph, male + girly
        Breasts or feminine body?
            Breasts -> gynomorph
        >>  Feminine -> male + girly <<
            Both -> gynomorph
            Neither -> male

This would indicated male + girly and the "Vertical Gender-tagging Flowchart" agrees but unfortunately the "Horizontal Gender-tagging Flowchart*" doesn't have that combination.

So far I haven't tagged a lot of intersex/(male)herm/andro-/gynomorph characters (none I think) and I'm not 100%sure.

But since no one gave any sufficient reasons for their changes here or in the post changes #3198302 I reverted them back to 'male (+ girly)'.

-------------------------------------------------

One could think about adding gynomporph_(lore) or herm_(lore) but both refer to the character knowingly being either one.
But Judy Hopps isn't Torafuta's character so thats out too.

The actual artist lists the character under Pixiv's 'futanari' tag which is 100% not 'girly male' or whatever stupid thing you're going on about, don't try to be a weird creep by explaining how the artist is wrong.

gobanana said:
The actual artist lists the character under Pixiv's 'futanari' tag which is 100% not 'girly male' or whatever stupid thing you're going on about, don't try to be a weird creep by explaining how the artist is wrong.

Do you know about TWYS ?
e6 doesn't care what the artist says and I'm not saying they're wrong. But none of that is relevant on e6!
The futanari tag is defunct on e6 and instead herm (Hermaphrodite) is used but there is no vagina visible in this picture -> not herm (nor futanari).
The artist can still call it futanari and that can be correct but since the vagina is not visible it shouldn't be tagged as such on e6.

Please explain to me how I'm wrong with a proper argument that is valid under e6 TWYS rules instead of repeating the previous one and calling me "stupid" and "a weird creep" (WTF?!).

kalider said:
I don't know what you and others do but you are correct that I actually didn't took them into account.
What the artist calls the gender is irrelevant under TWYS.

This would indicated male + girly and the "Vertical Gender-tagging Flowchart" agrees but unfortunately the "Horizontal Gender-tagging Flowchart*" doesn't have that combination.

So far I haven't tagged a lot of intersex/(male)herm/andro-/gynomorph characters (none I think) and I'm not 100%sure.

But since no one gave any sufficient reasons for their changes here or in the post changes #3198302 I reverted them back to 'male (+ girly)'.

-------------------------------------------------

One could think about adding gynomporph_(lore) or herm_(lore) but both refer to the character knowingly being either one.
But Judy Hopps isn't Torafuta's character so thats out too.

It’s worth noting that it is, after all, a “simplified” gender-tagging flowchart, and it does not really handle edge cases like this. There’s also a warning on that page that reads:

Note: The following diagrams/flowcharts are guides, not rules, and as with all guides—there will be some exceptions. So use your best judgement, along with the agreed opinions of other users as well.

So I would consider an image like this to be an exception. Even without breasts, the character still has a very clearly female body - completely feminine proportions in every way, not just a male who looks feminine. Wide hips, narrow shoulders, feminine facial structure, narrow neck, a very considerable thigh gap, etc. And as the gynomorph page says, that tag is to be used for a “female with a penis” - which is what I would consider this to be, personally.

@Vincentsaga, @Hamburgers015, @AzraelBattles1, @Technic-Wolf, @PurpleMelon, (& hahafunny) (= those tagged this one wrong repeatedly)
Well look at that! 6 Months ago a moderator/admin fixed this tag-war and what a surprise: Millcore knows the gender tagging rules and applied them as they should be. And I didn't even report it (thanks @gattonero2001 for that).
So thanks for nothing you bunch of ignorant downvoting apes - pls read and try to understand the relevant rules.
The only good thing I take away is I learned a bit about tagging genders with this post - I hope you do to.

At least LostInE621 and scaliespe tried to join the argument/discussion here but even that was apparently too much for you...