April 10th: The bill has been vetoed!
April 2nd: The politicians in Arizona are about to sign into law a bill that would mandate sites like e621 to either impose age verification on all users or be at a risk of lawsuits. Such system would be required to go through third party vendors, who in turn must go through a government database to verify every user's age. This is not only a major violation of privacy, but it also opens up a very real danger of identity theft through phishing schemes and other methods, not to mention that we would not be able to control any of that information to make sure it is permanently deleted after age verification is complete.
Unfortunately, Arizona is the state out of which e621 operates, which means that this law will almost certainly affect us if it is to pass. If want to help us ensure that this site can continue to serve you without being required to know who you are, please ask the Arizona governor to veto this bill.
Please, help us get the word out by letting others know about this issue.
For some further information on what the bill does have a look at https://action.freespeechcoalition.com/bill/arizona-hb-2586/
We still have a Discord server, come talk to us!
Want to advertise on e621? Click here!
You must be logged in to view this image. (learn more)
[ Blacklist Help ]
You must be over the age of 18 and agree to the terms of service to access this page.
By default a limited blacklist has been applied hiding content that is commonly objected to. You may remove items from this blacklist by using the blacklist menu item.
Maskarade
MemberAlright. This is a repost. But better editing. Beacuse someone got offended or something about the previous one.
user 39707
MemberWhat made you think replacing the text on the box was a good idea.
A child could have done that in MS Paint
(to be honest, I believe that is what happened)
also, the plural of colt is -not- colt's. what is the apostrophe doing there?
Brightwater
MemberAlso, you really should start tagging the original artist too.
Maskarade
MemberI would.. But if I people started editing my pics, and they tagged me, then the pictures they have made, would come up on my uploaded pictures. I wouldn't want that. That's why I write it on the image. Also, does the text on the box matter? These ponies are kids, they may not be good at gramma. I'm not trying to offend anybody.
NotMeNotYou
AdminWell, I simply hope that I understood whatever it was you tried to say but, Niggerfaggot drew the picture, you edited it, that means the posted picture was made by Niggerfaggot and you.
So both of you need to be tagged.
And if someone edits your edit then that guy has to tag Niggerfaggot, you (maskarade) and he himself.
And no, just because someone tags you on some picture doesn't mean it shows on your upload history.
It shows only up if someone searches for pictures which have your tag on it, not with you as the uploader.
Also, I never thought I ever use Niggerfaggot as a legitimate word without the intent to swear/sound racist...
Ohm Machre
MemberHonestly, neither would I.
But it's great art, so I don't care.
And, your point about tagging the original artist stands in my eyes. It's the same as taking some essay (for instance), modifying a few things, then posting it as your own work...
Well, maybe not exactly, but still.
Maskarade
Memberuser 188108
Memberi would have loved this image, but then.... Twist
VirginiaW
Blockedit seems like the only alteration that Maskarade did here is removing the penis/strapon/dildo that Scootaloo was using on Twist
am I missing anything else?
Login to respond »