man now i kinda wanna see a Pokemon/fallout crossover now like that would be the best game ever!!!

I noticed in the background outside the dabbing securitron

I take it that the platinum chip was used, considering the combat effectiveness display seen out the window.

babycake said:
Why is "dabbing" tagged. I don't see the dab.

look out the window

The story for the piece (I am assuming is from the artist) is in the description so, edited the tags to match the story. The whole "Tag-What-You-See" rule is pretty stupid when the artist says in the description what a character's gender is but people are like "Nuh-uh.....I can't see it so I don't believe that is what it is.....it's ambiguous."

blodhgarm92 said:
The story for the piece (I am assuming is from the artist) is in the description so, edited the tags to match the story. The whole "Tag-What-You-See" rule is pretty stupid when the artist says in the description what a character's gender is but people are like "Nuh-uh.....I can't see it so I don't believe that is what it is.....it's ambiguous."

I both agree and disagree with you on the tag what you see thing. The main problem is that anyone can come in and just alter that description from what i can see. This acts as a fail safe against that, though to be fair anyone can alter tags too.

Also alot of / most people come here to look at the pictures, not to do some light reading. If you can't see its lady parts or boy parts and there are no obvious signs of femininity or masculinity, it's safely ambiguous.

Therefore, yes. This Mewtwo is as ambiguous as the penetration.

In my opinion the tag what you see fixes plenty of problems. The system isn't perfect but it works fine.

Though also in terms of tag what you see, penetration really doesn't belong here either. But i guess that's just common sense.

If only there were more angles.

If I saw someone playing Smash with their Pokémon, I'd probably dab on them too.