April 10th: The bill has been vetoed!
April 2nd: The politicians in Arizona are about to sign into law a bill that would mandate sites like e621 to either impose age verification on all users or be at a risk of lawsuits. Such system would be required to go through third party vendors, who in turn must go through a government database to verify every user's age. This is not only a major violation of privacy, but it also opens up a very real danger of identity theft through phishing schemes and other methods, not to mention that we would not be able to control any of that information to make sure it is permanently deleted after age verification is complete.
Unfortunately, Arizona is the state out of which e621 operates, which means that this law will almost certainly affect us if it is to pass. If want to help us ensure that this site can continue to serve you without being required to know who you are, please ask the Arizona governor to veto this bill.
Please, help us get the word out by letting others know about this issue.
For some further information on what the bill does have a look at https://action.freespeechcoalition.com/bill/arizona-hb-2586/
We still have a Discord server, come talk to us!
Want to advertise on e621? Click here!
BioSkunk
Blockedthe outfit looks like something out of a tom clancy game
Blackbetty
MemberTom Clancy's Fennec cell ;D
Tainted1
MemberMagazine is in backwards
Blackbetty
Memberthats a daring thing to say talking about a non existant weapon.
Tainted1
MemberEngineering still tends to follow standard canon. If that's a power cell, its a inefficient shape if you're trying to store the max amount of amp-hours in a given volume. If it's a magazine for projectiles. well it's just plain backwards.
Blackbetty
MemberTainted1
MemberYou want to know how I know that you haven't actually ever handled any weapons?
Blackbetty
Memberfirst: I don't need to have handled everything iI draw. (haven't handled anthro fennecs and powersuits either.)
secound: "You haven't fired a weapon" is a redneck argument. don't be a redneck.
and third:No I don't want to know even if it is your greatest archievment this week, to know that I havn't fired a weapon yet. It's not like It's quantum physiks and if you get salty because of the direction of a slope of a magazine (seriously whoe does that) I can't help you,
PS: People like you are the reason artists don't anwer to their comments.
Tainted1
MemberWell, if you want to be a petulant child about it. IF it's projectiles then theres going to be a certain shape to the cartridge which will be either a straight cylinder or a bottle shape, the latter of course being more tapered in the direction of the projectile. Having a magazine in a ass backwards configuration as in this pic would severely limit the number of cartridges in the magazine. Being initially advised that it didn't quite look right you could have taken the criticism and adapted with it. Instead you decided to be a spoiled little shit throwing a little titty tantrum and expressing continued incompetence on the subject. Sometimes it's better keep ones mouth shut and let folks assume that your a damned fool than open it and remove any doubt.
Ratte
Former StaffYou can have a discussion without insulting each other, so I would advise doing so.
EightyNine
MemberBecause they can't take simple criticism?
It's a really obvious issue; it's backward, and for no real reason. It looks weird, regardless.
Blackbetty
Membercriticism is one thing. insulting and swearing is another. by the way if I decide the magazine is right that way, since it's my weapon it IS right.
Isn't design a great thing ;D
Btw again: The only reason a not-curved magazine (don't know the exact english term in german it's "Trapezmagazin")
has that slope is ergonomics not capacity. the bullets are stacked in a streight way.
Login to respond »