You must be logged in to view this image. (learn more)

Children: 1 child (learn more) show »
  • Comments
  • i vote for not cub :P shes young granted but small breast doesnt = cub bc she matured development in both hip:waist and the roundness of the breast

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • By the way, the muzzle makes me think about iPoke. I'll not be surprised if it's his picture.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • About the "not cub" note... If you search for cub or loli there are many pictures of them with hips. Argument invalid.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • The foreshortening in this picture makes it impossible to tell what the shape of her hips are. The waist is irrelevant.

    And that's not even taking into consideration that the tag refers to any underage character. In it's strictest form, that could mean up to 17! 17-year-olds usually have fully developed hips. It's safe to say if there is an argument to be had, it's probably worth tagging it as cub.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Anonym said:
    The foreshortening in this picture makes it impossible to tell what the shape of her hips are. The waist is irrelevant.

    And that's not even taking into consideration that the tag refers to any underage character. In it's strictest form, that could mean up to 17! 17-year-olds usually have fully developed hips. It's safe to say if there is an argument to be had, it's probably worth tagging it as cub.

    Thanks for deleting that note, was getting on my nerves lol.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • ThatOtherGuy said:
    Please explain how PawsRU is the source? It's just another imageboard.

    That's where I found it, though tbh it's not the source, because I don't know who the artist is. Sorry.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Vyss said:
    WTF is hip:waist? Is it some kind of a MatLAB interval definition?

    : means ratio hip:waist means hip to waist ratio

    Anonym said:
    The foreshortening in this picture makes it impossible to tell what the shape of her hips are. The waist is irrelevant.

    And that's not even taking into consideration that the tag refers to any underage character. In it's strictest form, that could mean up to 17! 17-year-olds usually have fully developed hips. It's safe to say if there is an argument to be had, it's probably worth tagging it as cub.

    you can't see hips? thats why i noted the significant hips that were illustrated. tag what u can see... i dont see any cub only short developed female, no school uniform, toys or lack of breast.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -2