nicole watterson (the amazing world of gumball and etc) created by hark
Parent: post #2275139 (learn more) show »
  • Comments
  • Genjar

    Former Staff

    marcheck said:
    I get how this WOULD be explicit. But, in its current form, it's really not.

    Anything that can be tagged as sex should usually be rated as explicit. Though I'm not quite sure if the sex tag is valid for this one.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • I don't understand...

    1) is the full explicit post released on his patreon and this is just a censored version
    2) This is the full version, first posted on his patreon and then released to the public?

    If this was the first case, then are artist with patreons allowed to post previews of their art here? I thought advertising your patreon like this wasn't allowed...

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • genjar said:
    Anything that can be tagged as sex should usually be rated as explicit. Though I'm not quite sure if the sex tag is valid for this one.

    I get where you're coming from with that. But, even though my mind is completing the image for me, I SEE no sex. Therefore, it's not explicit.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0