April 10th: The bill has been vetoed!
April 2nd: The politicians in Arizona are about to sign into law a bill that would mandate sites like e621 to either impose age verification on all users or be at a risk of lawsuits. Such system would be required to go through third party vendors, who in turn must go through a government database to verify every user's age. This is not only a major violation of privacy, but it also opens up a very real danger of identity theft through phishing schemes and other methods, not to mention that we would not be able to control any of that information to make sure it is permanently deleted after age verification is complete.
Unfortunately, Arizona is the state out of which e621 operates, which means that this law will almost certainly affect us if it is to pass. If want to help us ensure that this site can continue to serve you without being required to know who you are, please ask the Arizona governor to veto this bill.
Please, help us get the word out by letting others know about this issue.
For some further information on what the bill does have a look at https://action.freespeechcoalition.com/bill/arizona-hb-2586/
We still have a Discord server, come talk to us!
Want to advertise on e621? Click here!
[ Blacklist Help ]
You must be over the age of 18 and agree to the terms of service to access this page.
By default a limited blacklist has been applied hiding content that is commonly objected to. You may remove items from this blacklist by using the blacklist menu item.
Naysayer1230
MemberOh Sparrow, how I love your obscene bulges.
DrakoMoonBlood
MemberOh how I agree.
Calcoast
MemberAfter a while on this site, I realize that there are way too many pictures incorrectly tagged "bestiality".
https://e621.net/wiki/show?title=bestiality
"If the picture depicts an anthro(furry) character sexually involved with a feral character,use the anthro_on_feral tag instead."
Genjar
Former StaffAs you can see, anthro_on_feral is implicated to bestiality. So these are tagged correctly.
...I'll just go ahead and revert the wiki to the previous (correct) version.
Calcoast
MemberTo be fair, I was just following what the wiki said at that point in time. :P
Login to respond »