Stop changing the tags.
1: "stiff" is not a valid tag, as it's basically meaningless.
2: The plant spring on the upper character's leg is holly, not mistletoe. Mistletoe has round leaves and white berries.
3: The character on top does not look male, they look female. And we use tags to label what characters LOOK LIKE, not what they ARE. The rule is "Tag what you see, not what you know." If the top character is actually male, then use the "male_(lore)" tag to denote that, not any non-lore tags.

jacob said:
Stop changing the tags.
1: "stiff" is not a valid tag, as it's basically meaningless.
2: The plant spring on the upper character's leg is holly, not mistletoe. Mistletoe has round leaves and white berries.
3: The character on top does not look male, they look female. And we use tags to label what characters LOOK LIKE, not what they ARE. The rule is "Tag what you see, not what you know." If the top character is actually male, then use the "male_(lore)" tag to denote that, not any non-lore tags.

oh, neat, i was about to head to your profile and ask you stop trying to misgender the characters; nothing about the top looks like a female as there is no visible breast-tissue, so "at best" they're a non-defined gender, if not male,
and i don't disagree with the holly, but i also do not wish for the tags to be misleading and thus do not think there should be female-tags to the post,
and i would know the characters genders since they are mine,