skizu created by skizu
Viewing sample resized to 23% of original (view original) Loading...
  • Comments
  • Hudson

    Former Staff

    For your information, it most likely will fall short of attention if you put "Please add tags" in the description field. Instead, tag an image with the tag tagme. This way your post will show up to people looking for that tag (especially those with tagging projects and people who frequently look for the tag (like me)).

    I didn't clear out your description field, since it's against the rules to change the field if it's not your own post or belonging to the artist, character owner or commissioner, so you will have to do that yourself.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • HotUnderTheCollar said:
    For your information, it most likely will fall short of attention if you put "Please add tags" in the description field. Instead, tag an image with the tag tagme. This way your post will show up to people looking for that tag (especially those with tagging projects and people who frequently look for the tag (like me)).

    I didn't clear out your description field, since it's against the rules to change the field if it's not your own post or belonging to the artist, character owner or commissioner, so you will have to do that yourself.

    ... I did not know that. So thanks I guess?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • HotUnderTheCollar said:
    For your information, it most likely will fall short of attention if you put "Please add tags" in the description field. Instead, tag an image with the tag tagme. This way your post will show up to people looking for that tag (especially those with tagging projects and people who frequently look for the tag (like me)).

    I didn't clear out your description field, since it's against the rules to change the field if it's not your own post or belonging to the artist, character owner or commissioner, so you will have to do that yourself.

    It's not against the rules to alter descriptions, but you shouldn't remove descriptions that have a purpose. If someone uploaded something with "lol dickballs" in the description I'd probably clear that out.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Hudson

    Former Staff

    Blind_Guardian said:
    It's not against the rules to alter descriptions, but you shouldn't remove descriptions that have a purpose. If someone uploaded something with "lol dickballs" in the description I'd probably clear that out.

    I would like to address you on the fact that it is against the rules, for your understanding only. I'm not intending to backseat moderate here. I just want to correct you on the manner to avoid any misunderstanding.
    Citing from the code of conduct:

    Posting Abuse
    • Editing/creating post descriptions (if you are not the artist, uploader, character owner, or commissioner) to create information

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • HotUnderTheCollar said:
    For your information, it most likely will fall short of attention if you put "Please add tags" in the description field. Instead, tag an image with the tag tagme. This way your post will show up to people looking for that tag (especially those with tagging projects and people who frequently look for the tag (like me)).

    I didn't clear out your description field, since it's against the rules to change the field if it's not your own post or belonging to the artist, character owner or commissioner, so you will have to do that yourself.

    As one who is a swarn enemy of laziness, the (tagme) post is a sign of no care for the art. Just tag four or five at least. Adding in the obvious will at least show worth in the image.

    I don't mind adding in tags, though downvotes are deserved for lazy tagging.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • HotUnderTheCollar said:
    I would like to address you on the fact that it is against the rules, for your understanding only. I'm not intending to backseat moderate here. I just want to correct you on the manner to avoid any misunderstanding.
    Citing from the code of conduct:

    Huh, TIL. I don't really understand the reasoning behind it well but I guess it makes sense paired with the next line in the code of conduct. I'll have to give the rules a read over.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0