April 10th: The bill has been vetoed!
April 2nd: The politicians in Arizona are about to sign into law a bill that would mandate sites like e621 to either impose age verification on all users or be at a risk of lawsuits. Such system would be required to go through third party vendors, who in turn must go through a government database to verify every user's age. This is not only a major violation of privacy, but it also opens up a very real danger of identity theft through phishing schemes and other methods, not to mention that we would not be able to control any of that information to make sure it is permanently deleted after age verification is complete.
Unfortunately, Arizona is the state out of which e621 operates, which means that this law will almost certainly affect us if it is to pass. If want to help us ensure that this site can continue to serve you without being required to know who you are, please ask the Arizona governor to veto this bill.
Please, help us get the word out by letting others know about this issue.
For some further information on what the bill does have a look at https://action.freespeechcoalition.com/bill/arizona-hb-2586/
We still have a Discord server, come talk to us!
Want to advertise on e621? Click here!
NaukkaRais
MemberOk we need flash
cytoki
MemberNow we all need to admit how small that vagina is lmao
RandomUser3957
MemberSuch a shame. It honestly ruins the whole thing for me. If it was more realistically proportioned, this would be amazing.
NothingSpecial
MemberAfter years of having everything fit to take horses, (even felines) it's a nice change to have horses fit for a feline.
Okay, joking aside, though I agree, I might add the gigadick to my list of things that I just can't get past, but that could just be me.
The odd bulge makes me picture it exploding, in the not-fun fashion, and after 10 years in furry, I'm burned out on the practically-counts-as-fisting size queen thing.
Not saying no one should like it, just... ranting, I suppose, since bound public use is a subject I'd like more of.
edited for mysterious accidental deletion of part of quote.
Login to respond »